Greenpeace’s
 icebreaker is to leave Arctic waters after the environmental group 
claimed Russian authorities threatened to use force against it. 
The Arctic Sunrise was on Monday afternoon leaving the Kara Sea and anArctic shipping route after the Russian coast guard said it had entered the area illegally and warned it would use force if necessary, Greenpeace said.
It
 marks the end of a three-day incursion by Greenpeace into the 
NorthernSea Route to protest against Arctic oil exploration by Rosneft 
and ExxonMobil.
Four members of Russia’s coast guard carried out a
 “mandatory inspection” of the boat earlier on Monday, shortly after 
Greenpeace launched inflatable boats with banners reading “Save The 
Arctic” near a Rosneft exploration vessel.
Greenpeace said it would call on the Dutch government – where the 
icebreaker is registered – to consider a legal complaint about Russia’s 
alleged violation of the international law of the sea, and freedom of 
expression.
Russia had turned down three requests from Greenpeace for permission 
to enter the Northern Sea Route – a new potential transit for 
Asia-Europe trade – saying that the width of the ice belt was 
insufficient.
The Northern Sea Route, controlled by Russia, is seen as an increasingly interesting shipping alternative
 in the long term for Asia-Europe trade. But for the next decade or so, 
most experts believe it will be most useful in allowing Russia to export
 any oil or gas it is able to extract from sites close to its Arctic shoreline.
Rosneft and Exxon have started testing in the Kara Sea. Rosneft on 
Wednesday reportedly offered to buy Greenpeace a television set as TV 
programmes could give the environmental group objective information 
about Rosneft’s intentions.
Christy Ferguson, a Greenpeace campaigner on board the Arctic 
Sunrise, warned of the damage an oil spill could cause in the remote 
area. “If an accident happens here it will cause irreparable harm to the
 entire region. There is no proven method for dealing with an oil spill 
in icy conditions, and cold water stops the oil breaking down for many 
years. Polar bears, walruses and rare creatures like the narwhal will 
lose their habitat and this place would be devastated.”
Greenpeace says Russia’s refusal to grant it permission was contrary 
to international law, while it claimed drilling in the Arctic national 
park was against Russia’s environmental laws.
Russia’s ministry of transport on Wednesday justified denying the 
icebreaker permission, by saying Greenpeace had not provided information
 about the width of the vessel’s protective ice belt. 
 Source :http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b119257e-0e2b-11e3-bfc8-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2d63DWQz1




















